From: Neil Foster <neil.foster@newcastle.edu.au>
To: Stephen Pitel <spitel@uwo.ca>
Obligations <obligations@uwo.ca>
Date: 25/07/2020 03:46:37
Subject: Re: Supreme Court of Canada on Unjust Enrichment, Restitution and Wavier of Tort

So many issues here! I don’t feel qualified to comment on most of them, but I have to say I found Brown J’s analysis really lucid and helpful and appreciated finding out what on earth “waiver of tort” was (at [29]) before finding out that it isn’t really a separate cause of action!

Regards

Neil

 

 

NEIL FOSTER

Associate Professor, Newcastle Law School

Acting Program Convener, LLB(Hons)

 

Faculty of Business and Law

409 Hunter St

Newcastle

 

T: +61 2 49217430

E: neil.foster@newcastle.edu.au

 

Further details: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/profile/neil-foster

My publications: http://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/ , http://ssrn.com/author=504828 

Blog: https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog

 

 

The University of Newcastle (UoN)

University Drive

Callaghan NSW 2308

Australia

 

CRICOS Provider 00109J

 

 

 

 

From: Stephen Pitel <spitel@uwo.ca>
Date: Saturday, 25 July 2020 at 12:49 am
To: "obligations@uwo.ca" <obligations@uwo.ca>
Subject: ODG: Supreme Court of Canada on Unjust Enrichment, Restitution and Wavier of Tort

 

The Supreme Court of Canada has released its decision in Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock.  It is available at:

 

https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/18425/index.do

 

It cites several members of this list.  Happy reading.

 

Stephen

 

 

Western Law

Professor Stephen G.A. Pitel
Faculty of Law, Western University
(519) 661-2111 ext 88433
Vice-President, Canadian Association for Legal Ethics/Association canadienne pour l’ethique juridique